-
-
Digital Editions Coming Soon
-
The Florida Law Review presents quality, timely, and relevant works to provide a genuine benefit to the legal community at large. For 63 years, we have been proud to represent the University of Florida as the state's premier scholarly legal journal. Our efforts have led to the Florida Law Review being the only journal in the State of Florida to be ranked in the top 50 by Washington & Lee University.
Articles by Category
Civil Procedure
- Jordan E. Pratt, An Open and Shut Case: Why (and How) The Eleventh Circuit Should Restrain the Government’s Forum Closure Power
- Richard A. Epstein, Dunwody Distinguished Lecture in Law: The Constitutional Paradox of the Durbin Amendment: How Monopolies are Offered Constitutional Protections Denied to Competitive Firms
- Stewart E. Sterk and Kimberly J. Brunelle, Zoning Finality: Reconceptualizing Res Judicata Doctrine in Land Use Cases
- Lauren A. Kirkpatrick, Treading on Sacred Ground: Denying the Appointment of a Testator’s Nominated Personal Representative
- David Marcus, Flawed but Noble: Desegregation Litigation and its Implications for the Modern Class Action
Civil Rights Law
- Jordan E. Pratt, An Open and Shut Case: Why (and How) The Eleventh Circuit Should Restrain the Government’s Forum Closure Power
- Heather Reynolds, Irreconcilable Regulations: Why the Sun Has Set on the Cuban Adjustment Act in Florida
- David Marcus, Flawed but Noble: Desegregation Litigation and its Implications for the Modern Class Action
- Robert A. Garda, Jr., The White Interest in School Integration
- Hillel Y. Levin, Resolving Interstate Conflicts Over Same-Sex Non-Marriage
Constitutional Law
- Caycee Hampton, Confirmation of a Catch-22: Glik V. Cunniffe and the Paradox of Citizen Recording
- Kathryn A. Kimball, Losing our Soul: Judicial Discretion in Sentencing Child Pornography Offenders
- Jordan E. Pratt, An Open and Shut Case: Why (and How) The Eleventh Circuit Should Restrain the Government’s Forum Closure Power
- Scott A. Moss, The Overhyped Path from Tinker to Morse: How the Student Speech Cases Show the Limits of Supreme Court Decisions-for The Law and for the Litigants
- Jonathan Witmer-Rich, Interrogation and the Roberts Court
Criminal Procedure
- Caycee Hampton, Confirmation of a Catch-22: Glik V. Cunniffe and the Paradox of Citizen Recording
- Kathryn A. Kimball, Losing our Soul: Judicial Discretion in Sentencing Child Pornography Offenders
- Scott A. Moss, The Overhyped Path from Tinker to Morse: How the Student Speech Cases Show the Limits of Supreme Court Decisions-for The Law and for the Litigants
- Jonathan Witmer-Rich, Interrogation and the Roberts Court
- Nathan A. Frazier, Amending for Justice’s Sake: Codified Disclosure Rule Needed to Provide Guidance to Prosecutor’s Duty to Disclose
Governments and Legislation
- Lisa Heinzerling, Introduction: Climate Change at EPA
- Caycee Hampton, Confirmation of a Catch-22: Glik V. Cunniffe and the Paradox of Citizen Recording
- Kathryn A. Kimball, Losing our Soul: Judicial Discretion in Sentencing Child Pornography Offenders
- Jordan E. Pratt, An Open and Shut Case: Why (and How) The Eleventh Circuit Should Restrain the Government’s Forum Closure Power
- Courtney Gaughan, Some More Watters, Please: The Dodd-Frank Act’s New Preemption Standards Lighten Consumers’ Wallets
For More Articles by Category:
Select a category from the dropdown below or browse our Full Listing of Categories page.Fla. L. Rev. News
This Year in the Review
The Florida Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of its first alumni newsletter, A Year in Review, which can be downloaded by clicking here
New Hampshire Supreme Court cites Zoning Finality by Sterk & Brunelle
On October 12, 2011, the New Hampshire Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case of Brandt Development Co. v. City of Somersworth (2011 WL 4844422). The court quoted Stewart E. Sterk & Kimberly J. Brunelle, Zoning Finality: Reconceptualizing Res Judicata Doctrine in Land Use Cases, 64 Fla. L. Rev 1139 (2011) in support of the proposition that “zoning boards should not be required ‘to reconsider an application based on the occurrence of an inconsequential change, when the board inevitably will reject the application for the same reasons as the initial denial.’” Brandt, 2011 WL 4844422, at *2 (quoting Sterk & Brunelle at 1175). Click here to read the full opinion.
Environmental Law
- Lisa Heinzerling, Introduction: Climate Change at EPA
- Hari M. Osofsky, Multidimensional Governance and the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
- Stewart E. Sterk and Kimberly J. Brunelle, Zoning Finality: Reconceptualizing Res Judicata Doctrine in Land Use Cases
- R. Benjamin Lingle, Post-Kelo Eminent Domain Reform: A Double-Edged Sword for Historic Preservation
- Environmental Law Prof Blog Features Professor Sarah Krakoff’s Forthcoming Article, Planetarian Identity Formation and the Relocalization of Environmental Law
Florida Constitutional Law
- Caycee Hampton, Confirmation of a Catch-22: Glik V. Cunniffe and the Paradox of Citizen Recording
- Kristen Rasmussen, Shedding (False) Light: How the Florida Supreme Court’s Rejection of the Tort Falsely Implies Protection for Media Defendants: Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp, 997 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 2008)
- Akhil Reed Amar, Bush, Gore, Florida, and the Constitution
- Erwin Chemerinsky, The Meaning of Bush v. Gore: Thoughts on Professor Amar’s Analysis
- Richard L. Hasen, Bush v. Gore and the Lawlessness Principle: A Comment on Professor Amar